Comments on: Awesome Twitter Exchange on the Politics of Clean Energy http://www.greentechhistory.com/2010/02/awesome-twitter-exchange-on-the-politics-of-clean-energy/ America's two-century search for a more perfect power Fri, 23 Apr 2010 20:12:38 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Peter Aronoff http://www.greentechhistory.com/2010/02/awesome-twitter-exchange-on-the-politics-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2061 Peter Aronoff Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:59:16 +0000 http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1885#comment-2061 It's not perfect, and it's can't handle conversations between more than two participants, but I've found bettween (http://bettween.com) to be an excellent way to follow two-way conversations. For example: http://bettween.com/bradplumer/jessejenkins It’s not perfect, and it’s can’t handle conversations between more than two participants, but I’ve found bettween (http://bettween.com) to be an excellent way to follow two-way conversations.

For example: http://bettween.com/bradplumer/jessejenkins

]]> By: hapa http://www.greentechhistory.com/2010/02/awesome-twitter-exchange-on-the-politics-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2030 hapa Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:58:01 +0000 http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1885#comment-2030 ~~~ o how cruel ~~~ ~~~ o how cruel ~~~

]]> By: hapa http://www.greentechhistory.com/2010/02/awesome-twitter-exchange-on-the-politics-of-clean-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-2019 hapa Sat, 13 Feb 2010 06:30:01 +0000 http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1885#comment-2019 useful to see, but also kinda empty; notice no participants were named barack or jintao. or various other names one would hope for. plumer's attitude toward USA econ development is not isolated, nor neighborly, nor commendable. no one talked about either future shipping prices or trade balance. silo, silo, silo, and this is why they are not premiers or presidents. #atemporality: match each participant with the transition timeline they have in their heads! going back to plumer's comment on not caring about strengthening US manufacturing: i weep for my country's fiances. useful to see, but also kinda empty; notice no participants were named barack or jintao. or various other names one would hope for.

plumer’s attitude toward USA econ development is not isolated, nor neighborly, nor commendable.

no one talked about either future shipping prices or trade balance. silo, silo, silo, and this is why they are not premiers or presidents.

#atemporality: match each participant with the transition timeline they have in their heads!

going back to plumer’s comment on not caring about strengthening US manufacturing: i weep for my country’s fiances.

]]>