<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Energy Predictions for the Year 2000: The Executive, The Analyst, and The Professor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/</link>
	<description>America's two-century search for a more perfect power</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:00:52 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greenhoof &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Energy Secretary Steven Chu posts his nuclear rationale on Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator>Greenhoof &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Energy Secretary Steven Chu posts his nuclear rationale on Facebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-2072</guid>
		<description>[...] need to be argued. This is an old and kind of dirty trick. Just check out Philip Sporn using just about the same one in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] need to be argued. This is an old and kind of dirty trick. Just check out Philip Sporn using just about the same one in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green News</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1406</link>
		<dc:creator>Green News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-1406</guid>
		<description>Forecasts are good estimates, but like with hurricanes many are slightly off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forecasts are good estimates, but like with hurricanes many are slightly off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The BRAD BLOG : 'Green News Report' - November 19, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1316</link>
		<dc:creator>The BRAD BLOG : 'Green News Report' - November 19, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-1316</guid>
		<description>[...] Predictions for 2000: Who Got It Right?: Energy Predictions for the Year 2000: The Executive, The Analyst, and The Professor (GreenTech History)          digg_url = &#039;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7529&#039;; digg_title = &#039;&#039;Green [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Predictions for 2000: Who Got It Right?: Energy Predictions for the Year 2000: The Executive, The Analyst, and The Professor (GreenTech History)          digg_url = &#8216;http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7529&#8242;; digg_title = &#8221;Green [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rich</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1306</link>
		<dc:creator>rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-1306</guid>
		<description>You can go fairly deep exploring forecasts, but from my own explorations there are too many variables to conclude much from the forecasters themselves or the general economic climate (the 70s).

Amory Lovins is interesting because he was always beyond the pale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can go fairly deep exploring forecasts, but from my own explorations there are too many variables to conclude much from the forecasters themselves or the general economic climate (the 70s).</p>
<p>Amory Lovins is interesting because he was always beyond the pale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexis Madrigal</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1301</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexis Madrigal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-1301</guid>
		<description>Indeed. Fixed. Thanks, o!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. Fixed. Thanks, o!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver Morton</title>
		<link>http://www.greentechhistory.com/2009/11/1971-energy-predictions-for-the-year-2000/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 22:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greentechhistory.com/?p=1561#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Great post

I think you&#039;re mission three zeroes in para 4 though

best, o</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re mission three zeroes in para 4 though</p>
<p>best, o</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
